| |

What
secularists fail to recognize is that Christianity in
America has been the most gracious, tolerant
religion when it comes to allowing other religions
to coexist. America has been the champion of unprecedented
tolerance toward other religions (or the lack thereof). The
United States has allowed other religions to worship freely
since the signing of the Constitution, while yet retaining
our Christian culture, society, and laws. It is because
we are Christian that we have grace toward others.
It is because we are Christian
that we have reasonable, protective laws. NO nation can be completely
neutral on ANY issue (because personal beliefs will always come
into play). So why not retain a benevolent moral scripture
to be the basis for law and public policy …. just
as our founding fathers did? Why are the political actions of
our forefathers deemed brilliant, except in the case of
their support for the Christian religion? Why do secularists
feel the need to “fix” what wasn’t broken to
begin with? The founding fathers’ formula for liberty,
based upon Christianity, created the most free, prosperous,
productive nation in history. With such unprecedented success,
why on earth has this formula been abandoned?
What
practicing Christians know to be true is that American
Christianity and its proclamation is precisely WHY we
have prospered for our first 185 years as a nation. God is very
real, and very much in the business of corporately blessing those
nations who honor Him. And once Christianity
is completely taken out of our government creeds, currency,
schools, laws and monuments ... religious tolerance will be gone
with it, not to mention the removal of the hand and blessing
of God this nation has enjoyed without precedent for over 200
years. The South Carolina Supreme Court agreed
with this notion in the case of the City of Charleston
v. Benjamin (1846). The court wrote:
What
gave to us this noble safeguard of religious toleration ...? It
was Christianity .... But this toleration, thus granted, is a
religious toleration; it is the free exercise and enjoyment of
religious profession and worship, with two provisos, one of which,
that which guards against acts of licentiousness (immorality),
testifies to the Christian construction...
What
constitutes the standard of good morals? Is it not Christianity?
There certainly is none other ... The day of moral virtue in which
we live would, in an instant, if that standard were abolished,
lapse into the dark and murky night of Pagan immorality...
In
the Courts over which we preside, we daily acknowledge Christianity
as the most solemn part of our administration. A Christian witness,
having no religious scruples about placing his hand upon the book,
is sworn upon the holy Evangelists – the books of the New
Testament which testify of our Savior’s birth, life, death,
and resurrection; this is so common a matter that it is little
thought of as an evidence of the part which Christianity has in
the common law …
I
agree fully to what is beautifully and appropriately said in (the
case) Updegraph
v. The Commonwealth (1824) … ----Christianity, general
Christianity, is, and always has been, a part of the common law:
“not Christianity founded on any particular religious tenets;
not Christianity with an established church … but Christianity
with liberty of the conscience to all men.” #73
David
Barton, in his book Original Intent states it this way:
“In
the view of the Charleston court, Christian principles had produced
America’s toleration for other religions; and while American
did legislate according to Christian standards of conduct for
social behavior, it did not tell other religions how, where, when,
or even whether to worship. The only restraints placed on those
religions were that their religious practices not be licentious
or subversive of public morality or safety. Aside from those stipulations,
America granted broad religious toleration to other religions
NOT IN SPITE OF, but BECAUSE of its Christian beliefs.”
#74
This distinctly American Christian identity, with a grace
toward other religions, is what has set us apart from
any other nation before us. We have proven that a Christian nation
(with a holy, yet benevolent God) can govern and flourish without
banishing those present who do not believe. The freedoms
we have enjoyed can exist only amongst a moral people.
These liberties will eventually dissipate without a moral compass,
or a Moral God. Without the Absolutes of Christianity,
all reason is cast aside. Right becomes wrong, and wrong becomes
right ... and people become lost within their own philosophies.
Woe
to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light
and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for
bitter. -Isaiah 5:20, NIV
If we do not work to turn back the deception that has slowly crept
into our nation’s corporate mindset about the “neutrality”
of secularism … we are doomed to lose this great
nation that our forefathers so courageously and selflessly fought
for. America became free because it was first
Christian … not Christian because it was first
free.
"When
a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses
over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and
its speaker a raving lunatic." - Dresden James
#75
“There
is nothing so absurd but if you repeat it often enough people
will believe it.” -Dr. William James, Father
of Modern Psychology #76
“Make
the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they
will believe it.” –Adolf Hitler #77
“How
fortunate for leaders that men do not think.”
–Adolf Hitler #78
“All
that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
–Edmund Burke #79

73)
City Council of Charleston v. S.A. Benjamin, 2 Strob. 522-524(Sup
Ct. S.C. 1846). [return to document]
74) David Barton,
Original Intent, The Courts, the Constitution, & Religion,
(Aledo, TX: WallBuilder Press, 2000), p. 70. [return
to document]
75) http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/d/dresdenjam136280.html
[return to document]
76) David Barton,
The Myth of Separation (Aledo, TX: WallBuilder Press, 1991),
p. 46. [return to document]
77) http://en.thinkexist.com/quotes/adolf_hitler/
[return to document]
78) Id. [return
to document]
79) January 9,
1795, in a letter to William Smith. John Bartlett, Bartlett’s
Familiar Quotations (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1863,
1980), p. 374. David Barton, The Myth of Separation (Aledo,
TX: WallBuilder Press, 1991), p. 262. Carroll E. Simcox, comp.,
4400 Quotations for Christian Communicators (Grand Rapids, MI:
Bake Book House, 1991), p. 124. [return
to document]
|
|