| |

It
was the abuses within religions that Jefferson
despised, not religion, itself. And even though he questioned
some of religion’s supernatural elements, he was mindful
of its value toward the maintenance of morality within society,
and within government. To forbid its efficacy upon the very institution
that wields power over the people would have been unwise. While
he strongly upheld the First Amendment’s directive in prohibiting
a national denomination, he never meant to bar
Christianity in general from being a political and governmental
influence. Jefferson was a champion of liberty
in all things … especially the freedom of man to think for
himself. To see the Court-sanctioned censorship of Christianity
in the public square today and the accompanying demise of morality
and decency that has come with it …. would have been as
offensive to Jefferson’s sense of liberty,
morality and equality as the religious disparities and abuses
of his time. It would have been especially repellent in the light
of the fact that today’s censorships have come down from
the courts against the will of the majority of Americans!
His prophetic fear of judicial tyranny over the
will of the people was evident in these statements:
“The
Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the Judiciary,
which they may twist and shape into any form they please.”
#16
“You
seem . . . to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of
all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed,
and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.
Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have,
with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege
of their corps. . . . [A]nd their power the more dangerous as
they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other
functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has
erected no such single tribunal.” #17
Abraham
Lincoln was one of many American leaders who concurred
with this healthy suspicion toward the Judiciary
that has unfortunately become obsolete in today’s system:
“I
do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional
questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court. . . . At the
same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy
of the government upon vital questions affecting the whole people
is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court,
the instant they are made . . . the people will have ceased to
be their own rulers, having . . . resigned their government into
the hands of that eminent tribunal.” #18
-Lincoln’s Inaugural Address
The
Judiciary was intended to be the least
powerful branch of the government, particularly because
it was an unelected branch, and its sole purpose
was to interpret laws as they were originally written,
not to twist old laws into new laws as they deem fit. Lawmaking
must be left in the hands of the legislative branch…
the branch elected by and therefore subject to the people.

16)
Thomas Jefferson, Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies,
From the Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Randolph,
editor (Boston: Gray and Bowen, 1830), Vol. IV, p. 317, to Judge
Spencer Roane on September 6, 1819. [return to
document]
17) Thomas Jefferson,
Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Albert Ellery Bergh, editor (Washington
D. C.: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904), Vol. XV,
p. 277, to William Charles Jarvis on September 28, 1820. [return
to document]
18) James D. Richardson,
A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents,
1789-1897 (Published by Authority of Congress, 1899), Vol. VI,
p. 9, “Inaugural Address” on March 4, 1861. [return
to document]
|
|